Alhaji Ibrahim Ali Amin, a former governorship candidate in Kano and a prominent member of the African Democratic Congress (ADC), has expressed strong dissent regarding President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s assertion that the All Progressives Congress (APC) has fulfilled its decade-long commitment to effect change for Nigerians.
In an exclusive interview with DAILY POST, Little articulated his concerns in response to the President’s comments made during a book launch and project inauguration in Imo State. He characterized the changes experienced by Nigerians under Tinubu's administration as predominantly negative.
The term "change," he remarked, encompasses both positive and negative connotations. According to Little, if one were to consult ordinary Nigerians—those detached from the APC-led government—an overwhelming majority would contest the President's claims. He stated, “Individuals who do not benefit from the APC’s patronage would not support what the President has said. His tenure has resulted in increased suffering for Nigerians; the challenges faced during the Buhari administration have, in fact, intensified.”
Further criticisms were directed towards the APC-led government for its perceived disconnect from the realities of ordinary citizens. Little emphasized that effective governance should prioritize tangible outcomes over mere rhetoric, stating, “Governance comprises 99% action and only 1% communication. Regrettably, the current administration is characterized by extensive verbal commitments with little substantial influence on people’s lives.”
He also critiqued the President's handling of national security, asserting that the administration has failed in its foremost constitutional obligation to safeguard lives and property. Little questioned the status of security nationwide, asking whether any Nigerian could sincerely assert that improvements had been made.
He pointed out that atrocities committed by Boko Haram, kidnappers, and bandits had escalated, transforming into a national tragedy rather than remaining a localized issue. He noted that numerous local governments in Katsina, Sokoto, and Zamfara States have fallen under the control of bandits, asserting, “In certain localities, citizens are compelled to pay taxes to these criminals instead of their government.”
Little reiterated that the Nigerian Constitution explicitly delineates the primary responsibilities of the President as securing the lives and property of citizens and protecting national sovereignty and territorial integrity—obligations he believes have been egregiously neglected.
He stated that the territorial integrity of Nigeria has significantly deteriorated, with parts of the nation effectively governed by criminal elements. Additionally, he lamented that under Tinubu’s leadership, the economic situation has deteriorated, resulting in increased poverty and struggles for basic necessities among the populace.
Moreover, he criticized the President for failing to visit areas that have suffered attacks, suggesting that Tinubu seems more preoccupied with attending social events than addressing these critical issues. “Since assuming office, he has not visited any regions affected by Boko Haram or banditry, yet has attended a senator’s wedding in Kaduna and a funeral in Plateau,” he remarked.
Regarding the economy, Little asserted that the current climate has rendered many Nigerians poorer than ever, with rising hunger and unemployment rates. He expressed alarm over the pervasive poverty and despair while contrasting this with the behavior of government officials who, in his view, engage in rampant misappropriation of public funds.
He highlighted the detrimental impact of increased taxation on citizens, asserting, “From any angle one examines this presidency, it is characterized by hardship. Yes, a form of change has occurred; however, it is undeniably negative.”
Little also dismissed claims of social intervention and empowerment programs by the federal government, labeling them as deceptive. He questioned the legitimacy of reported achievements, stating, “When the government claims to have empowered numerous individuals, one must ask, who are these beneficiaries? For instance, if they assert that they have employed 100,000 people in Kano, where can one find them? Perhaps 500 or 1,000 exist, but the majority are mere facades.”
He similarly criticized the student loan scheme, asserting, “Programs may appear effective on paper, yet the implementation is often lacking. How many students have genuinely benefited from these loans? Very few. While the documentation may suggest progress, the realities indicate that little is functioning properly.”
In conclusion, Ibrahim Little firmly asserted that President Tinubu’s claims regarding the fulfillment of the APC's promise for change are far removed from the truth. “In a democracy, individuals may express any sentiment; however, Nigerians are acutely aware of their struggles. The change we were promised has resulted solely in anguish, hunger, and insecurity.”
Post a Comment